Without a doubt, intermodal transportation has unlimited potential. On paper, the value proposition is unbeatable: lower costs, a smaller carbon footprint, and the massive capacity of rail and container ships. Yet, despite decades of investment, we are still waiting for intermodal to move past its “potential” and start delivering on its promises. The reality is that the Intermodal Industry has a severe interoperability problem where it continues to struggle both physically and digitality. While its pricing is attractive, shippers aren’t just buying a price point—they’re buying reliability and better transit times. As long as intermodal transportation interoperability remains fractured, it will continue to remain stagnant.

In this article, I’m pulling back the curtain on why intermodal transportation is stalled. I’ll start by revisiting the era when intermodal actually did innovate—back when standardization was a breakthrough, not a buzzword. From there, I’ll diagnose the unique “snarls” that the Intermodal Industry faces today. You might be surprised to hear that its biggest hurdles aren’t just digital; they are physical friction points that no amount of expensive software or AI can unknot on its own. Finally, I’ll lay out the specific, actionable interoperability breakthroughs required to finally bridge the gap between “good on paper” and “seamless in practice.” Indeed, it is time for intermodal organizations to stop polishing their 1960s model and expecting 2026 results.

1. Fundamentally Intermodal Transportation Has Not Changed in Decades Though Its Potential Is Unlimited.

At its core, intermodal transportation has not fundamentally changed in decades. Now, to some degree, intermodal transportation has modernized with features like sensors and GPS tracking. However, the physical process of transferring intermodal containers between ships, rail, and trucks remains manual and fragmented. As a result, both intermodal’s transit speed and reliability continue to suffer. What’s more, this lack of interoperability progress is the primary reason intermodal’s market share remains stagnant; despite a significant cost advantage over Truckload.

On the other hand, I see intermodal as an industry with unlimited potential. So let’s first look back at the revolutionary innovations that built this industry. Then we can begin to identify solutions that will get the Intermodal Industry back on the right track.

a. Intermodal Innovations 1960s Through 1980s.

Prior to the 1960s, most freight was shipped using a labor-intensive process called “break bulk,” where items were packed by hand into ships, trucks, and trains. This process was costly and slow due to constant loading and unloading at each transfer point. Then there were several innovations that revolutionized multimodal transportation. These included:

• 1960s – Standardized Intermodal Containers. Indeed, standard intermodal container sizes like 20 ft, 40 ft, and 53 ft allowed goods to be transported in the same container across different modes of transportation without unloading and reloading the contents. This significantly reduced costs and increased efficiency. Indeed, this was especially true for the transport of freight over rail and international ocean shipping.
• 1980s – Double-Stack Intermodal Rail Cars. Another innovation was the capability for intermodal rail cars to carry two stacks of containers, enabling intermodal shipments to transport more cargo. This made rail transportation a particularly efficient mode of transit.

b. Rapid Expansion of Intermodal in the 20th Century, But Now Stagnation.

Since the mid-20th century, the intermodal industry has focused on scaling its original innovations rather than evolving them. For decades, the strategy was purely about volume: ships grew larger, and ground facilities multiplied to support global commerce. However, this era of growth has hit a wall. Stagnation is setting in, particularly in the U.S., where ground-based intermodal traffic has trended lower in recent years. We are now seeing the limits of a 20th-century model that prioritized bigger assets over smarter, more integrated systems. For more on the history of intermodal and its current status in the market, see Inbound Logistics’ article, What Is Intermodal Transportation? History, Benefits, Examples.

“… the physical process of transferring intermodal containers … remains manual and fragmented. … transit speed and reliability continue to suffer.”

2. The Intermodal Transportation Snarl: 5 Physical Interoperability Problems Tech Alone Can’t Fix.

Outside the Intermodal Industry, I would be the first to offer technology-based solutions for most interoperability problems within a supply chain. However, AI or an API “quick fix” is not going to have a significant impact on improving intermodal’s slow transit times, reliability, or poor asset utilization. This is because intermodal’s most significant deficiencies aren’t just solved using digital solutions; they are physical problems. While intermodal transportation is the right choice for cost and carbon footprint on long hauls, Intermodal Industry can do so much more if it could solve its unique physical interoperability issues. To detail, below are the top five physical interoperability challenges holding the industry back.

Top 5 Intermodal Physical Interoperability Challenges

Intermodal Transportation Snarls: 5 Physical Interoperability Problems Tech Alone Can’t Fix

• The Infrastructure Gap: A Continuing Lack of Intermodal Transportation Facilities. For example, there are many U.S. shipping locations that are more than 100 miles from an intermodal facility.
• The Handoff Hurdle: Intermodal Transportation Transfers Take Too Long. For instance, a digital status update may signal that a container is “Ready for Pickup,” yet the drayage driver waits four hours in a physical queue.
• The Synchronization Struggle: Managing Rigid Cutoff Times and Schedules. To illustrate, a flat tire delays a drayage truck just five miles from the terminal. Despite the port having “real-time visibility”, the physical cutoff time passes, and the container is “rolled” to a vessel departing seven days later.
• Regulatory Gridlock: The Physical Impact of Compliance. For example, customs flags a container for a random x-ray inspection. While the documentation is digitally perfect, the physical act of moving and inspecting a container at an off-site location adds 48 hours to the transit time.
• Asset Scarcity: The Volatile Availability of Equipment and Containers. For instance, a shipper has the order, the truck, and the data ready to go. However, because the physical chassis are trapped at a different terminal, the shipment cannot move.

For a more detailed discussion on the Intermodal Industry’s physical interoperability challenges, see my article, Intermodal Transportation Snarls: 5 Physical Interoperability Problems Tech Alone Can’t Fix. Also, in this article, I’ll share with you resources and solutions, both digital and physical, that can help to move past the status quo.

” … intermodal’s most significant deficiencies aren’t just solved using digital solutions; they are physical problems.”

3. A Path to True Intermodal Interoperability: The Physical Internet Initiative.

One promising effort to address the Intermodal Industry’s interoperability challenges is the Physical Internet (π) initiative. This is a physical interoperability concept conceived by Benoit Montreuil and currently being piloted in several countries. Inspired by the digital internet’s open-access model, the π initiative envisions a shared logistics network where goods move as seamlessly as data packets. At the Physical Internet’s core are standardized, modular, and intelligent “π-containers”—interconnected units routed through optimized, shared transport and storage hubs. Without a doubt, this particular initiative has the potential of seamless physical interoperability, addressing challenges such as infrastructure gaps, hand-off hurdles, and syncing schedules to name a few. Key components of the Physical Internet include:

Key Components of the Physical Internet

• π-Containers. These interlocking containers make it easy to handle, store, and transport. Further, they must be simple to seal, snap to a structure, interlock together, load, unload, build and dismantle. See chart for example of different size of interlocking containers
• π-Movers (Modes of Transport). There are different types of movers within the Physical Internet that can transport, convey and handle containers within and between logistics nodes. See chart below for examples.
• π-Nodes (Intermodal Facilities and Physical Systems). The nodes correspond to geographic sites, facilities and physical systems of the Physical Internet. This includes more intermodal and transload facilities as well as facilities to support for intermodal operations within urban areas. See chart below for examples.

For a more detailed discussion on the Physical Internet Initiative and its advantages, see my article, The Way Of The Physical Internet: Innovative Logistics To Under Cut Costs, CO2 Emissions, And More?.

The Way Of The Physical Internet: Innovative Logistics To Under Cut Costs, CO2 Emissions, And More?

“At the Physical Internet’s core are standardized, modular, and intelligent “π-containers”—interconnected units routed through optimized, shared transport and storage hubs. … has the potential of seamless physical interoperability

4. The Digital Integration Gap: Building a Connected Intermodal Transportation Data Network.

Achieving digital interoperability is a difficult but mandatory requirement for staying competitive in today’s digital world. For instance, a supply chain cannot truly capitalize on its digitization efforts if data remains trapped in internal silos or cut off from partner systems. Moreover, for a complex intermodal operation, the challenge goes beyond simply moving data back and forth; it requires a more resilient digital framework to rapidly share information effectively within its intricate transportation network. To better understand how to bridge this data integration gap, let’s examine intermodal’s unique digital pitfalls and the essential building blocks for achieving true data interoperability.

a. Intermodal’s Unique Digital Interoperability Pitfalls.

As discussed previously, intermodal transportation already has a serious physical interoperability problem, but it also has unique digital interoperability challenges compared to other modes of transportation. As a result, intermodal information sharing is erratic and its data networks are fragile. In many cases, this is driven by the physical complexity of intermodal. More specifically, intermodal transportation needs more coordination, has more regulation to contend with, and hasmore stakeholders that need information. As a result, intermodal has severe digital interoperability pitfalls to include:

Intermodal Data Interoperability Pitfalls

Intermodal Transportation Tech: Solving Interoperability & Integration Pitfalls

• More Laborious Integration Setups: Traditional integration setups are already slow and costly. Intermodal has more systems to integrate.
• More Types of Digital Transactions to Exchange: Intermodal has complex operational processes. Thus, it has many more types of information requirements to transmit than just basic shipping events like “shipped”, “intransit”, “delivered”.
• More Complex Digital Interactions and Processes. Along with more types of digital transactions, data interfaces between systems need to support more complex interactions. As most data integrations are already complex using customized, proprietary data translations, complexity only multiplies.
• More Digital Disruptions. Without a doubt, maintaining data interoperability is challenged by the highly disruptive, volatile nature of intermodal operations.
• Data Owners Have Little Incentive to Share Data. In many cases, data owners often have competing interests with the many of the stakeholders within an intermodal network. Also, sometimes the reluctance to share data is because of inertia where stakeholders are not aware, nor motivated to access valuable data.

For more on intermodal’s digital interoperability pitfalls, solutions, and benefits, see my article, Intermodal Transportation Tech: Solving Interoperability & Integration Pitfalls.

b. The Basic Building Blocks to Achieve Digital Interoperability. 

Regardless of the significant interoperability obstacles that the Intermodal Industry faces, digital interoperability for any organization comes down to three non-negotiable building blocks. Namely, a data connection between systems, a shared meaning of the data transmitted, and mutual trust between partners. If any one of these is missing, true data interoperability fails. Moreover, in this modern age of AI and Internet of Things (IoT), seamless information sharing includes not just between systems, but with smart devices, AI agents, and even the physical products themselves. To summarize, below are the three basic building blocks to achieve data interoperability.

The Three Components of Data Interoperability

Logistics Data Interoperability: Advice To Make It Understandable, Usable, Secure

• System Data Connectivity: This enables data transfer between systems. For example, this would include data transfer methods such as FTP or API.
• Common Business Terminology: Data integration needs to be business-led, tech-enabled to assure the data sent is understood. For instance, organizations must have well defined (measurable) business terminology and corresponding data standards that conveys meaningful information between partners’ systems.
• Trusted, Secure Data: Need to leverage digital identity tech to achieve confidence in the data exchanged by partners, systems, AI agents, and objects. For instance, this can include digital identification authentication approaches such as multi-factor security.

For a detailed breakout of these ingredients and technology needed to achieve data interoperability, see my article, Logistics Data Interoperability: Advice To Make It Understandable, Usable, Secure.

“… a complex intermodal operation … requires a more resilient digital framework to rapidly share information effectively within its intricate transportation network.”

Conclusion.

So, intermodal transportation’s origins were based on true interoperability innovations that revolutionized both International shipping and the transport of freight by rail. Today, innovation is still needed to overcome the interoperability challenges that intermodal faces today. First, there is a need for new approaches to address intermodal’s physical interoperability ongoing issues. Indeed, by intermodal overcoming and mitigating physical interoperability roadblocks, it can also fully leverage digital technologies and data interoperability to make it a much better competitive transportation option.

More References.

For more intermodal and interoperability reference, see below:

• Intek’s article, What Is Intermodal Transportation? The Complete Guide
• Wicker Park Logistics’ article, Advantages and Disadvantages of Intermodal Freight Transportation
• Phil Yeager, Hub Group, article, What Is Intermodal Shipping…and Why Should Shippers Care?
• Ab Ovo’s article, How to Manage Intermodal Container Transport Efficiently?. This article provides a software vendor’s perspective on intermodal, breaking out key logistics activities and transport status flows for a typical intermodal shipment.
• SC Tech Insights’ article, Mastering The Shipping Data Life Cycle: The Way To A Complete View Of The Truth
• SC Tech Insights’ article, The Way To Better Supply Chain Analytics: Overcome Data Interoperability With Intelligent Tracking Status

The Way To Better Supply Chain Analytics: Overcome Data Interoperability With Intelligent Tracking Status

Need help with an innovative solution to make your supply chain data ready? I’m Randy McClure, and I’ve spent many years solving data readiness challenges to help decision-makers gain better, faster insights and for organizations to leverage data-intensive technologies. As a supply chain tech advisor, I’ve implemented hundreds of successful projects across all transportation modes, working with the data of thousands of shippers, carriers, and 3rd party logistics (3PL) providers. I specialize in pilot projects and program management for emerging technologies. If you’re ready to modernize your data infrastructure or if you are a solution provider, let’s talk. To reach me, click here to access my contact form or you can find me on LinkedIn.

For more from SC Tech Insights, see the latest articles on Transportation and Interoperability.